Is it correct to say that children are to be banned to see nude, adult oriented pictures?
Question:
Answers:
Yes, it'd be better if children were prevented from such events, because they may not truly understand the implications of sex, and fetishes, etc.
st
Other Answers:
yes.
It is not for Minors (17 and below). Protection of Monors by Federal Law.
eg
"RESTRICTION OF ACCESS BY MINORS TO MATERIALS
COMMERCIALLY DISTRIBUTED BY MEANS OF WORLD WIDE
WEB THAT ARE HARMFUL TO MINORS"
yes absoulately
they are too young to understand the images
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
they are to be banned FROM seeing., I think!
OF COURSE. CHILDREN ARE WAY TOO YOUNG TO BE EXPOSED TO THAT SORT OF STUFF.
no its my personal opinion that lake of talorince comes from not knowing
yes, until they are 18+ --- that also includes games of an adult-nature.
yes it is.. why do they need to see they anyways? They have a curious enough mind to check them selves out,and can easily figure out a lady has boobs when she gets older.
It doesnt stop them. They just lie about their age on the internet. There's no way to really tell. It's a bullsh*t law, because it doesn't work.
Yes.
definitely..showing them open the risk of a potential under 19 raper !! We wont want thAT.
nUDE PICS IS A BAN FRO EVERYBODY!!
Yes.until you're about 16, anyways. Too many kids getting pregnant at 13-14 years old, just because they see sex everywhere and don't realize the consequences. The internet is a horrible place for children.they should have two internets, one for what is was meant for and one for the public to use without worries of porn around every corner:)
Yes, of course its right to say that children are to be banned to see nude, adult & oriented pictures.Who knows what they'll think. Morever after seeing all this, some children develop a mental block against natural sex, & then it is very difficult to convince them. Do you want you're child to be one of them?
I would be an example of what you refer to as "children", but it doesn't matter what we kids are allowed to see, becuase the schools are what cause kids my age to look at porn. What I'm saying is that when kids talk at school, they will eventually end up talking about stuff like that because of one perverted kid. This happened in my school, and now little kids as low as 3rd grade are trying to have sex and date! its absolutely absurd how that can happen, but like I said, it is the school that should be watched, then the kids and what they are permitted to see, because if a kid doesn't think about it all the time(through what kids talk about in school), they won't be led to going on desperate searches for corrupting images like that.
Source(s):
source? no, just a corrupted school
Yes. Period.
I really don't know whether banning nudity from the eyes of children would have some effect. After all, children just love doing what grown-ups disapprove. What should be done however, is attempt to limit exposure of kids to nudity, until they are grown enough to have an understanding of the matter.
depends. if its a medical shot, where its just showing human anatomy, no, they shouldnt be banned from it.
however anything of a sexual nature, yes. children that are exposed too early to pornography generally develope psychological disorders.
YES
Yes. Children are too young to fully understand sex. Their youth and innocence make them vulnerable to being manipulated by predators. You and I are old enough to recognize a pervert pedophile, kids aren't.
More Questions and Answers
- How can i stop cutting myself??
- Is Asperger's linked to Poverty?
- Are there people who have to take antidepressants forever?
- Is there any carers support lines in East Lancashire?
- Should I just move on? (please be respectful)?
- at times, do you want to just feel sorry for yourself?
- Where can I find a therapist that specializes in grief? I live in the LA area.?
- Anxiety Disorder??