Aren't ALL Men Supposed to Get Circumcised?
SO, I THOUGHT EVERY MEN GOT CIRCUMCISED AT BIRTH...UNTIL RECENTLY WHEN I GOT WITH MY PRESENT BOYFRIEND.. SO, WHAT ARE THE NEGATIVES OR POSITIVES OF NOT BEING CIRCUMCISED AND WHO GETS CIRCUMCISED
Answers:
No, outside of some religions/cultures there aren't many valid reasons to get circumcised. Because circumcision has become part of the US culture, it's hard to root out; many myths about the foreskin has popped up, like the one that most men are circumcised.
The foreskin is not dirty if kept clean, certainly no dirtier than any other part of the body. It's really easy to keep clean. The foreskin also has thousands of nerves and it protects the glans, so the inside of the foreskin and the glans are very sensitive. The foreskin isn't significantly more prone to diseases/infections and condoms >>> circumcision anyway. There are studies that say it reduces cancer of the penis and HIV rates, but these can be easily preventable without circumcision (and penis cancer is very low as is).
Circumcisions are sometimes medically necessary when there is a serious problem with the foreskin. Only like 5% of all uncircumcised men will have a problem with his foreskin and only a fraction of that warrants circumcision. Infant circumcisions carry their own risks which many people don't realize. If the complication rate is between 0.2 to 5%, that means that between 2 in 1000 and 50 in 1000 will have some complication, as minor as excessive bleeding to as severe as death. Cancer of the penis is stated at like 1 in 100,000 men, so if even 1 circumcision in 100,000 results in disfigurement or death, the purpose is essentially defeated. So benefits and risks don't always balance out the way people say.
About 80% of the world's male population is uncircumcised, and the rate of circumcision in the US has dropped to between 50% and 60%, and keeps dropping. People are realizing that circumcision is not medically necessary the vast majority of the time, and other factors such as personal hygiene and safe sex easily replace/outweigh most of the benefits of circumcision. Consider yourself and your boyfriend lucky if you've no problems.
Can anyone tell me a bit bout their experience at a nudist beach/colony?
No, not at all. The US, South Korea and the Philippines are the only countries that circumcise most male children for medical reasons, this was a medical fad in the late 19th century.
It actually doesn't have any proven medical basis other than an alleged but now discredited reduction in cancer of the penis.
It improves hygiene somewhat.
Can doctor's tell if you have masturbated?
this one has been asked several times. Click on discover, you will find many awnsers about this topic
no it isnt required- it is cleaner
Negatives are it causes cervical cancer in women.
Negatives are they don't feel as good during sex as a circumcized man dos, however sensativity can be increased by pulling the foreskin back during intercourse.
Positives are they are usually much larger than circumcized men.
does working out and lifting weights cause breakouts?
not being circumcised was thought to be unhealthy by a generation or three of the medical world, but if he washes well you have nothing to fear, negativly if he has a circumcision he can lose lots of the sexual joy he feels in his natural state, there is no reason in the world for butchering male babies anymore than the arab mutilation of the female sex organ. nothing in the world wrong with a natural man.
More Questions and Answers
- why cant I quit smoking, what can I try?
- Do girls find it attractive if a guy shaves all his body?
- How to last at a job?
- It there any safe Ayurvedic medicine that can treat loose erectil and premature ejaculation permanently ?
- uhh masturbation problem.?
- How manyeth timeth a dayeth DO YA BEAT YER MEAT?
- do i have big feet?
- Whats wrong Wit me?