Do guys with there penis circumsized have better sex or guys without? girls also answer?
Question:
Answers:
Most studies on that issue have found an uncircumcised penis to be a bit more sensitive, that includes studies from this year and others from a few years back. One study also found that women preferred uncircumcised guys. I'll discuss some of the studies later on and have the links to some of the studies below in the sources section. Ultimately they both typically work fine, as as said, they both look alike when erect. Circumcision is a traditionally Jewish and Muslim procedure, although it was introduced and encouraged to the Western, developed world as a way to stop masturbation, especially with the help of Dr. Kellogg. (see link 1) However, although scientific studies have discovered that circumcision harms masturbation by up to over 60% (2), needless to say, it doesn’t completely stop masturbation. Many circumcised guys find it more convenient to use a commercial lubricant as a result (3) since the typically moist foreskin that is like the eyelids is not present to rub the glans with (4).
Most developed nations quickly rejected circumcision after noticing its ineffectiveness against masturbation, and as a result the United States remains the last developed nation doing it to a significant percentage of newborns. (5) This was done as a result of the for-profit American health care system promoting myths about benefits of circumcision (6), such preventing penile cancer (6a, 6b), preventing HIV (6c, 6d) despite the USA being the developed nation with the highest HIV rates and circumcision rates (6e, 5), and preventing STDs (6d, 6f). As a result, circumcision is now brings in hundreds of millions of dollars to doctors and the American health system. (7)
However, circumcision has been becoming less popular as years have passed by. In the 1960s over 90% of guys were circumcised in the USA, now circumcision rates are as low as 14% in some states. (8) More and more parents are discovering that circumcision carries more risks than benefits, and realize that by leaving their sons uncircumcised, they have the choice of choosing what they’d like, since the surgery is irreversible.
Circumcision risks include the loss of sexual pleasure according to multiple studies (2, 9, 10, 11). Those studies take into effect many sensation points, including the foreskin, and they involve many participants. There have been other studies that claim no difference, but they don’t even take into effect the nerve endings on the foreskin, which as seen in one study, are some of the most sensitive points on the penis (10). One study even found an increase in erectile dysfunction rates after circumcision (10a). In another study, it was found that females ended up reaching orgasm with and preferring uncircumcised males in 9 out of 10 cases (10b). In addition, circumcision is extremely painful on newborns (12, 13, 14), and you risk many bad conditions, such as a buried penis when too much foreskin is removed and limits the size of the penis (15), or adhesions or skin bridges that develop from the head to the shaft when the skin heals after the surgery (16), meatal stenosis [occurs in up to 10% of circumcised males!] when the opening of the penis becomes irritated from too much exposure and rubbing and begins to close up (17), and meatal ulcers (18). All those risks are, of course, not including the possibility of having too much skin removed, which can cause discomfort during erections due to lack of skin to allow the penis to expand, and could consequently cause a hairy penis by pulling pubic hair and skin to the shaft. Often a circumcision scar develops around the penis after circumcision. In addition, circumcision has negative effects on breastfeeding. (18)
To conclude, here is a link that describes the anatomy of the foreskin (19) and the development of the foreskin with infants, a link especially helpful for parents (19a). Ultimately, one survey found that although uncircumcised guys are a bit more satisfied percentage-wise, it’s within the margin of error. (20) The only difference is that those unsatisfied uncircumcised guys can simply get circumcised and end up satisfied either way. In addition, in one survey it was found that up to half of circumcised guys expressed concerns on wishing to have had the choice themselves. (21) That, along with the risks and negative effects that are being seen more with the help of the Internet, may be what is bringing down circumcision rates.
. Girls can't feel the difference, so that's out.
And that's an IMpossible question to answer. Good Sex goes wayyyy beyond the foreskin! Most of it's in your head, how you're feeling about yourself and your partner.
As long as the foreskin isn't infected or too tight, it's actually more natural than a circumcision. .
Well, I don't think there's really a difference. And guys would'nt really know except if they already had sex when they were still uncircumsized. I'm circumsized by the way, and I know that penis uncircumsized or not, looks the same when erect. Anyway, it all boils down to the penis' head. That's where most of the sensation is. I'd say they're equal. :]
I've experienced sex being uncircumcised and now circumcised. I can say that sex after being circumcised was better. When I was uncircumcised sex consisted of me sliding in and out of my own forskin rather than my partner's vagina. Now that i'm circumcised I can enjoy the pleasure of direct stimulation to the head of my penis, without having to worry about forskin interference.
As a girl I prefer uncircumcised. I have also heard this from most women who have had both, and seen it in studies, that is is more pleasurable for the woman. As to the guy...hard to say because most people haven't experienced both. Those who have, like the guy above me, have different opinions too - the fact is, things are different for everybody. I have heard some people say better afterwards, some say not. I do suspect that with people have the problem like the guy above me, something is wrong, it's not usually like that. In that case good if circumcision works for them but I have heard more say they regret it than vice-versa.
well honestly i think uncircumsized is better. im 22 i had sex with 3 people in my entire life and the first two used condoms and they were circumsized it was horrible. when i met my 3rd boyfriend now husband he had an uncircumsized penis when we had sex the first time it was wonderful then we had sex the second time with no condom it was even better it is said that the foreskin is smoother and it doesnt cause soreness because of its ability to glide in and out of the vagina without causing friction and abrasion of the vulva now i must say men with small penises that are uncircumsized might had a problem sliding out there foreskin so not much they can do for u but men with big penises and foreskin fill out just fine and its more stimuation to the woman....... this helped
More Questions & Answers...