Let's say aloud you could control medical research funds... please read on?

By controlling medical research funds, you are in a position to guarantee that a cure will be found surrounded by 15 years for any disease you chose. Unfortunately, no progress on any others would be made. Would you choose to target one disease?

---

Answers:    I wouldn't target any one disease. Diseases aren't the central problem. There are countless possible microbes which can impose disease, and it doesn't make sense to develop vaccines and cures for respectively one.

Instead, I'd put all of the funds into researching a channel to greatly strengthen the human immune system. This might involve stem cell research, pharmaceuticals, or nanotechnology.

---

If i could only choose one disease to cure and not spread the research funding over several diseases, consequently i would definitely settle next to one. i'd pick cancer.

---

Related Questions...

Odd Twitch?

Arthritis?

What laxative, within preparation for colonoscopy, cause kidney harm?

Food stuck contained by throat?